It’s to be just about three years because Smith & Wesson lugged out the 2nd generation that its M&P pistols. This pistols sports improvements—inside and out—over the original M&Ps, yet until now there was one thing missing from the second-generation lineup: a subcompact.
You are watching: Smith and wesson m&p 1522 magazines
The brand-new Smith & Wesson M&P M2.0 Subcompact is offered in 9mm and also .40 S&W and with and without a ignorance safety. The 9mm and .40 versions are identical yet for caliber and capacity. Over there is likewise a .45, however that gun is larger in every dimension. The .45 has a much longer four-inch barrel, 8+1 capacity and weighs 2.4 ounces more. Every version of the Subcompact, no matter the caliber, is the same price.
I derived a sample of the 9mm version with no thumb safety for testing since it is likely to it is in the most renowned version. The Subcompact sporting activities a 3.675-inch barrel and also a 12-round volume in 9mm (10 rounds in .40).
Other than its abbreviation size, it uses all the same features uncovered on the Compact and also full-size M&P pistols. These are polymer-frame, striker-fired pistols constructed for rigorous use. Both the slide and also barrel space stainless steel and given one Armornite corrosion-resistant finish, and the pistol is rated because that +P ammunition.
Factory standard sights room steel with three dots, and also the Subcompact has actually the exact same dovetails as the bigger M&Ps so all of the aftermarket sight alternatives like fiber optics and tritium will fit this pistol together well. The M&P has actually an 18-degree tight angle, i beg your pardon in layman’s terms means it’s lot closer to a 1911 than, say, a Glock. It come with 4 interchangeable backstraps.
With plenty of striker-fired pistols you’ll watch a safety bar on the trigger. With the M&P the trigger itself is the pivoting safety and security lever. There is an interior striker safety and security as well. As I mentioned, friend can also buy the Subcompact through a manual safety. That lever is ambidextrous and is situated at the height rear that the frame, comparable in place to where you’ll find the thumb safety on a 1911.
This pistol comes v two 12-round magazines. One has actually a do the washing up base pad, the other prolonged base pad. With the expanded base pad newspaper in place, i can gain my entirety hand top top the gun, but when using the do the washing up base pad, my pinkie is left hanging. However, the flush base pad is half an customs shorter, make the total slightly much easier to conceal. Ns say “slightly” due to the fact that it is normally the butt of the pistol that prints under clothing.
Before us dive deeper right into the details of the pistol, let’s look in ~ the changes and improvements in between the first- and also second-generation M&Ps. The two greatest have to deal with the create pull and the grip.
By far, the two most common species of customization done to first-generation M&P pistols have been cause jobs and increasing the texturing that the grip area, usually with stippling.
First-generation M&Ps have an advertised 6.5-pound pull, which seems to be the standard cause pull load for pistols draft to be “service weapons,” together the M&P was. Heavy create pulls ~ above duty firearms are regularly meant to be an additional safety. The only difficulty with this is most civilization buying M&Ps aren’t cops, and the American customer is acquiring awfully picky once it come to trigger pulls. Heavy cause pulls make it harder come shoot accurately, much less quickly, and also who desires that?
Smith & Wesson engineers took a long look in ~ what was being done to the first-generation M&Ps to boost the create pulls, and so for the M&P M2.0 they decreased the cause pull weight mainly through improved geometry in the sear and also striker. The targeted spec for the M2.0’s cause pull is 5.5 pounds, and that’s simply what I got with my check gun. I’ve actually placed a most rounds downrange through various sizes the M&P M2.0 pistols, and also every cause pull has been within a quarter-pound of the 5.5-pound spec.
More than the trigger-pull weight, what a lot of of world didn’t like about the trigger pull ~ above the initial M&P to be the lack of a discernible reset. Reset shouldn’t issue in a defensive pistol. In any kind of self-defense scenario, nobody will certainly be worried around the reset on your trigger; they’ll just be pulling the as fast as feasible until the trouble is solved. Still, S&W designers addressed the problem, and the triggers on the M&P M2.0s have very positive reset; you deserve to both hear and also feel it.
Many people thought the factory texturing on the fixed of the original M&P was also slick. As a result, hand-stippling was a typical sight. Many thanks to modern-day injection-molding techniques, stippling her M&P M2.0 is no longer necessary. The manufacturing facility texturing ~ above the frame and backstraps the the M&P M2.0 is as aggressive together stippling, and that is no exaggeration.
I’ve constantly carried the gun i shot in USPSA competition and vice versa, and for years ns avoided stippled grips because I assumed the stippling would certainly chew through my shirt. Finally, around 10 years back I obtained my very first stippled grip, and I will never ever go back.
I lug this increase because, together I said, the smith & Wesson framework texturing is as aggressive as hand-stippling, but just like stippling, you will not need to worry around it wearing v your covering garment. However, I would certainly recommend having actually some layer of cloth (a slim T-shirt is every that’s necessary) in between your skin and also the framework of the pistol, or you will experience what medical experts term a skin abrasion.
The first-generation M&Ps came with three sizes of interchangeable backstraps: small, medium and also large. According to the people at blacksmith & Wesson, 80 percent of users prefer the medium backstrap.
M&Ps have never been my an initial choice for a lug gun simply because the pistol never fit mine hand properly. The tool backstrap was simply a tiny too little for me, and the big backstrap adds a tiny bit that meat ~ above the back, however is mostly simply fatter than the medium, which ns didn’t want. The closer a pistol fixed is come round, the less naturally that points.
Apparently, ns wasn’t the only human who had this issue. The M&P 2.0 in every sizes comes gave with no three but four backstraps: small, medium, medium-large and large.
The large news below is the medium-large backstrap, which has actually the exact same girth as the medium but adds a curve in ~ the peak to provide more material under the web of the shooter’s hand to increase reach to the trigger. ~ above both the full-size and also Compact M&P M2.0, i love-love-love the medium-large backstrap, however I was surprised to find that on the Subcompact the tool backstrap is a far better fit because that me.
That’s the good thing around having four sizes of backstraps. They permit you to fit the pistol to your hand as much as possible. Swapping out backstraps takes every one of 10 seconds.
Here is my just complaint about this specific pistol. The M&P M2.0 uses the exact same proven magazines as the original M&P. I’m guessing smith & Wesson has actually a lot of of extended base pads left end from the first-generation S&W M&P Subcompact, because the one provided with this pistol does not have actually that wild M2.0 texturing. The expanded base pad felt a small slick under my pinkie.
One complain I’ve heard around M&Ps because that a while is the ambidextrous on slide stop. You’ll an alert S&W doesn’t term the a “slide release,” due to the fact that if you’re a southpaw and shot to relax the on slide by pushing under on the right-side lever, fuhgeddaboutit. You’ll discover it takes around four times as much force as pushing down on the left-side lever. You’re much far better off simply working the on slide by hand.
You might notification the absence of a beavertail top top the framework of the second-generation M&Ps. Blacksmith & Wesson has eliminated the beavertail, so currently the rear of the frame doesn’t really stick out any kind of farther than the behind of the slide. ~ above the full-size pistol this makes less of a distinction than top top this subcompact pistol destined because that a concealed-carry role.
The scalloped serrations in ~ the rear of the slide haven’t changed, yet with the M2.0 you’ll see S&W has included some minimal serrations in ~ the prior of the slide close to the bottom whereby it meets the frame. I wish S&W had actually been willing to relocate some the the on slide markings to completely serrate the prior of the slide, but at least the behind serrations are aggressive.
There are small cutouts in ~ the bottom that the frame on every side to offer you a little better grip ~ above the floorplate of the magazine must you need to strip one the end by hand.
The inner steel chassis within the polymer framework is much longer on the M2.0 보다 on the original M&P. S&W calls it an “embedded strictly stainless steel chassis,” and also it also has an Armornite coating. In the first-generation M&P the chassis didn’t expand much previous the front of the create guard, however on the new model the stole in the structure goes most of the way out to the finish of the frame.
On the original M&P the serial number in the stole chassis might be seen through a home window cut into the polymer at the rear of the frame. In the M2.0 the serial number in the stole chassis is located above the tactical rail, visual proof the chassis extends lot farther.
This longer, stiffer frame makes more of a difference on the full-size M&P, ensuring over there won’t be any type of flex if you cave a large weapon light on the frame’s tactical rail. However even through the Subcompact, less framework flex amounts to greater reliability.
The “loaded-chamber indicator” is just a hole through the behind of the barrel hood. It is nearly useless in anything various other than direct sunlight, yet it allows the M&P to be offered in claims that mandate specific safety functions on guns.
I was lucky enough to reap some serious create time through the M2.0 in ~ the S&W Academy as soon as the pistol was an initial introduced. At the time, the editor of a major gun magazine remarked he assumed the new gun must be dubbed the “M&P 1.1” since in his opinion there weren’t many alters to it.
But I’ll respond to that’s since not numerous things needed to be done to the M&P. Did ns mention any kind of changes S&W made to the design to enhance reliability, which is the most important element of any kind of defensive firearm? No. They didn’t make any because none required to it is in made. That says a lot.
Range time v the Subcompact lugged no surprises. That fired every little thing I fed it and was nicely specific for a subcompact.
The M&P Subcompact is lot smaller than the full-size M&P, yet it is no a pocket gun, and also you will need a holster. The said, it will certainly fit into any holster produced the first-generation M&P Subcompact and also conceal under just about any garment.
A an excellent review that this pistol wouldn’t be complete without a comparison come its closestly competitor: the M&P Shield. A lot of civilization think one of the factors why blacksmith & Wesson to be so slow to present a subcompact version of the M&P M2.0 is because of the success the the subcompact Shield. They might be right, but these are far from the same guns.
The M&P Subcompact is the same height as the Shield, yet it is approximately a half-inch longer, weighs a couple of ounces more, and is remarkable thicker. The Subcompact looks and also feels like a chunk of a gun compared to the very flat Shield. However, the thickness doesn’t just offer a nice personality; it offers you substantially an ext capacity 보다 the Shield.
These pistols are the same elevation only if the Shield is wearing its do the washing up seven-round magazine. Meanwhile, the Subcompact supplies a 12-round capacity. Plus, you can reload the Subcompact with those large sticks supposed for the Compact and/or full-size M&P M2.0, i m sorry ups your capacity to 15 or 17 rounds. Last, the Subcompact has the 4 interchangeable backstraps, which the Shield walk not.
If this sounds like I’m ganging increase on the Shield, ns don’t typical to. The Shield is absolutely easier to conceal and also carry than the Subcompact, but that doesn’t come there is no a price. The an excellent thing about the Subcompact is the if you’re a fan of the M&P design and also wanted a small, concealable pistol, girlfriend now have actually one more option.
American consumers have had accessibility to compact 9mm pistols for decades. Ns owned a smith & Wesson 3913 back in the so late ’90s, and also the pistols these days are much superior come those weapons of yesteryear.
The blacksmith & Wesson M&P M2.0 Subcompact is a perfect example. Castle have better ergonomics, vastly enhanced reliability, much better texturing top top the grips, much better sights, far better everything. And once you change for inflation, you’ll view that many thanks to advancements in manufacturing, they expense less, too.
See more: How To Shade Paint Tool Sai Tips N Tricks Tutorial, Shading Tutorial In Paint Tool Sai
SMITH & WESSON M&P M2.0 SUBCOMPACTTYPE: striker-fired semiauto CALIBER: 9mm Luger (tested), .40 S&W, .45 ACP (larger dimensions 보다 9mm, .40) CAPACITY: 12+1 BARREL LENGTH: 3.7 in. OAL/HEIGHT/WIDTH: 6.6/4.5/1.2 in. WEIGHT: 24.0 oz. CONSTRUCTION: Armornite-coated stainless stole slide, polymer frame TRIGGER: 5.5 lb. Traction (measured) SIGHTS: 3-dot steel SAFETIES: sear block drop, create safety lever (as tested) PRICE: $569
Buy it now. log on come GalleryofGuns.com, select this firearm, salary a deposit and it will be in ~ your local gun save in 2 days. When purchased from GalleryofGuns.com, Davidson’s assures to fix or change this